Monday, August 10, 2020
Admission Essay Submission
Admission Essay Submission My visceral reaction to Lolita remains a mystery to me. The words manifested in my body, and remain there today. This book is foundational to me because of its portrayal of divine creatures and the exhibition of basic human desires and imperfections. Stories of centuries ago would flit around us as her voice gave life to Orpheus, the musician, Prometheus, the maker of man, and Pan, the god of nature. In times of strife, I would often revisit these myths, using them to process and understand the stress of my young life. So, must all beauty be false and can truth only come ugly? Then, how does one interpret morality in relation to beauty? By using satire to infiltrate the minds that would not be receptive to direct anti-war messages, we allow the anti-war messages to form in the readersâ own heads. We allow people to see past what the media and authority figures have trained them to believe and instead think for themselves in their own self-interest. I invite St. Johnâs to help me find that book, and perhaps I will be able to help someone else find theirâs. War Satire as a sub-genre is of particular importance. Although divorce is not an issue of the gods, they fell in and out of love and this was synonymous with events in my own life, and with members of my own family. While arguments with my brother could never be described as divine, our struggles often reminded me of the fights between Apollo and Artemis, siblings who squabbled but ultimately loved each other. The story of Orpheus, the musician who looked back at the last second to ensure his beloved was following him, remains a non-example in matters of perseverance. In contrast, if my copy of Don Quixote didnât have footnotes, I would be quite lost. The Dâaulaireâs take on Greek tales gives sweetness and life to staggeringly human stories while still painting characters in divine light. Although gods, the heroes of Olympus would make mistakes, get angry, and fall in love. This basic principle that even gods made mistakes allowed me to process my everyday life. These seditious thoughts that break the myth of glory, and prevent unnecessary sacrifice are of great value if we are to have a society comprised of critical thinkers. Such a society is necessary if the poor are to overcome the effects of media and politicians made up of and owned by the wealthy. Catch-22 speaks to me because I donât have the combat experience many people associate with military service. It spends most of its pages describing the time between combat, the little absurdities that make up the majority of time in the military, with very short bursts of action. I share a cultural reference frame with Catch-22 that enriches the experience. The seriousness of war, literally life and death, makes it a subject people tend to develop core values around. Being overtly anti-war could cause you and your message to be immediately dismissed by those that view an anti-war stance as anti-troop or anti-patriotic. The poor pay the price while the rich reap the benefit. My initial impression was that the truth of Lolita, its ugliness, was hidden behind its beautiful prose. It uses flowery words of love and affection to trick the reader into believing in some kind of horrid love story. They weigh so heavily on each other that it is impossible for them to existence independently. There is no way to read Lolita and believe one has at last found the truth of Dolores and Humbertâs story. It is a book of perpetual discussion, conversation, and questioning. I had thought that my job as the reader was to peel back the layers of beautiful imagery to reveal the novelâs and Humbertâs grotesque center. I wanted to brush off the proselike dust off an old book. I had thought that the truth was beneath this, like a mystery waiting to be solved. Maybe there was someone who had successfully revealed the âtruthâ of Lolita in all itâs ugliness, someone who had pushed past all Lolita âs beauty and emerged with a final knowledge of it. To clarify, my response was not a result of any past trauma.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.